Holiday 2023
Ecosphere Environmental Services, Inc. staff join Barr Ecosphere Principal and now Barr Senior NEPA Consultant Mike Fitzgerald (left), with Barr Vice President and Environmental Management Facilitator Todd Fasking (right).

Ecosphere Environmental Services, Inc. staff join Barr

In October, the staff of Durango, Colorado-based Ecosphere Environmental Services, Inc. joined Barr. A trusted environmental services partner to clients in a range of industries for 30 years, Ecosphere specializes in environmental compliance and permitting, natural resources surveys and studies, cultural resources management, and geographic information system (GIS) services.

The addition of Ecosphere expands Barr’s capabilities in the western U.S. in areas such as National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Endangered Species Act (ESA) analyses, and Clean Water Act (CWA) compliance and permitting. Ecosphere has offices in Durango and Pagosa Springs, Colorado; and Albuquerque and Farmington, New Mexico, all of which Barr has retained.

“We’re excited to welcome the staff of Ecosphere to our growing team,” said Barr’s president and CEO, Ward Swanson. “Ecosphere’s talented, experienced employees will enhance our ability to serve clients in the Four Corners region and beyond—they’re similarly focused on delivering exceptional outcomes for clients.”

Staff of the combined organization are committed to providing Ecosphere’s clients with a smooth transition and uninterrupted project support, along with access to Barr’s additional capabilities and services.

Barr welcomes staff from Ecosphere’s offices in Durango, Colorado (left); Pagosa Springs, Colorado; Albuquerque, New Mexico (right); and Farmington, New Mexico, enhancing Barr’s ability to serve clients in the Four Corners region and beyond.


Ecosphere Principal Mike Fitzgerald said, “We’re confident that this next chapter for Ecosphere clients and employees will be an outstanding one. Both Barr and Ecosphere enjoy strong reputations based on integrity, technical accuracy, and transparency, and we share a highly collaborative approach to our work.”

Ecosphere’s client base includes local and federal government agencies, public and private utilities, commercial developers, renewable energy producers, manufacturers, telecommunications companies, fuel and mining companies, real estate developers, banks, tribal organizations, and private landowners.

For more information about Barr’s expanded capabilities in the western U.S., contact our team.

About Mike Fitzgerald

Mike Fitzgerald, senior NEPA consultant, has three decades of experience with National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Water Act (CWA), and Endangered Species Act consulting and compliance. Over the course of his career, he’s managed thousands of environmental projects in the Rocky Mountain region and southwestern United States for a wide range of industries. With a biological background, Mike has expertise in planning and executing biological- and aquatic-resource inventories and assessments. He also has experience with CWA alternatives analyses associated with individual permits. Prior to joining Barr, Mike owned and led Ecosphere Environmental Services, Inc., now part of Barr. Under his guidance, Ecosphere flourished, earning a reputation for conducting sound environmental science that clients can trust. Mike is excited to continue delivering high quality, collaborative support to current clients as part of the Barr team and to expanding these services into additional markets and regions.

 

Mike Fitzgerald, Senior NEPA Consultant
Mike Fitzgerald
Senior NEPA Consultant
Contact our team

 

In This Issue

Theme picker

Ecosphere Environmental Services, Inc. staff join Barr

Ecosphere Environmental Services, Inc. staff join Barr

A zoo with a view: Treetop Trail opens

A zoo with a view: Treetop Trail opens

Clean water for the Yanesha people of Peru

Clean water for the Yanesha people of Peru

Adding RNG to your energy portfolio

Adding RNG to your energy portfolio

Happy holidays from all of us at Barr!

Happy holidays from all of us at Barr!

Theme picker

Five steps to develop a greenhouse gas inventory for agricultural manufacturing

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon footprints are a growing area of focus for many economic sectors in the United States and around the world. The carbon footprint of products may influence how environmentally conscious consumers spend and how lenders invest their money. As a result, many industries are incorporating environmental initiatives to reduce GHG emissions. Food product manufacturers are requesting GHG information from their supply chain to define and improve their carbon footprints and meet environmental, social, and governance (ESG) objectives.

Developing a carbon footprint through GHG accounting is not a standard procedure. It varies between industries and from facility to facility, depending on the activities that occur; however, many agricultural processing facilities across the country share some common practices and activities that can be useful when developing a carbon footprint.

Five steps to develop a GHG inventory

1. Set organizational boundaries.

The first step is setting organizational boundaries for facilities with joint operations to avoid double counting (e.g., two companies holding interest in a joint operation). You can determine boundaries based on operational control or equity share.

2. Set operational boundaries.

The next step is to set boundaries based on the typical flow of operations. For agricultural manufacturing facilities, this generally includes agricultural inputs, agricultural operations, transportation to factory, factory operations, other factory inputs (such as raw materials or chemicals), and factory outputs.

3. Determine Scope 1, 2, and 3 emission sources.

From the operational boundaries identified above, you can organize GHG emission sources into three scopes based on the criteria outlined in the GHG Protocol1. Scope 1 emissions are those directly resulting from the operations. Common Scope 1 emissions include factory fuel combustion, vehicle emissions, and agricultural practices, such as fertilizer application. Scope 2 emissions are from third-party electricity suppliers. Scope 3 emissions include downstream and upstream sources, such as GHGs from the manufacturing of purchased fertilizer or third-party transport of products to the end users. It is common for companies to start with Scope 1 and Scope 2 inventories before pursuing Scope 3.

GHG emission sources organized into three scopes
As outlined in the GHG Protocol, GHG emission sources can be organized in three scopes.

 

4. Quantify emissions.

Site-specific emission factors and inputs are ideally used to develop a GHG inventory. These emission factors may be based on stack testing, material balances, or analytical results. You can base inputs on accounting or other facility operational records.

Although some calculations may be complex, the equation to quantify emissions is relatively simple: Emissions = Emission Factor x Activity Throughput.

Although some calculations may be complex, the equation to quantify emissions is relatively simple: Emissions = Emission Factor x Activity Throughput.

There are a few best practices to keep in mind for emissions factors. As mentioned previously, use site-specific data when possible, such as monitoring data and analytical data. Another way to establish emission factors is through published emission factors, including AP-42 and 40 CFR Part 98. If these first two methods don’t apply, you can use the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Published Guidance, Environmental Protection Agency guidance, or other studies, or use engineering judgement to set your emission factors. Similarly, activity throughput is also more accurate when using site-specific data when possible (e.g., monitoring data and accounting records). You can also refer to market studies and engineering judgment to make assumptions for throughput when needed.

5. Update, review, and refine.

Once you develop a GHG inventory, there should be a regular process to update, review, and refine your GHG accounting information. To keep your GHG inventory up to date and accurate, consider updating your inventory, reviewing emissions, refining calculations, implementing emission reductions, and repeating this process annually. Keep in mind that an annual review is a good goal to have; however, the appropriate frequency may depend on your reasons for developing a GHG inventory in the first place.

Meeting sustainability and ESG objectives

As a facility develops and tracks its GHG inventory, the information may be used to provide carbon footprint information to consumers and suppliers, develop marketing materials to communicate sustainability initiatives, and identify sources for GHG reductions. GHG inventories serve as an important tool to document, track, and implement sustainability objectives and to provide transparency to stakeholders.

If you’re looking for a partner to help you get started with GHG accounting, Barr’s team of experienced environmental specialists can help you assess your operations and calculate your GHG inventory. Contact us to learn more about how we can assist you with achieving your ESG goals.

About the authors

Taryn DeRosia is a chemical engineer with five years of experience helping clients meet regulatory requirements for air, water, and waste. She provides assistance with routine compliance requirements in the agriculture and food product sector, such as permit applications, routine reporting, technical program evaluations, and regulatory agency communications.

Allison Serakos, environmental scientist, helps Barr’s clients solve complex problems in air, water, and climate programs. Her project work involves assessments related to GHG emissions and climate change, GHG reduction strategy development, air dispersion modeling, meteorological data analysis, and forecast model development. Before joining Barr, Allison completed her Master of Science in Land and Atmospheric Science, with a focus on upper atmospheric and climate dynamics.

1 "Greenhouse Gas Protocol." World Resource Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). https://ghgprotocol.org/.

Article Style2/3 Width
Hero Image

Author(s)

 

Taryn DeRosia, Chemical Engineer
Taryn DeRosia
Chemical Engineer

 

Allison Serakos, Environmental Scientist
Allison Serakos
Environmental Scientist
Contact our team

 

Industry
  • Manufacturing
Services
  • Environmental Investigation and Remediation
  • Sustainability and Resiliency
Content Type
  • Article

Theme picker